Financial Comparison
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. vs Procter & Gamble Co
Click a ticker to view the full analysis.
In short
Procter & Gamble Co is the more profitable of the two, keeping 18.4% of revenue as net profit against 1.6% for e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. trades at the higher trailing P/E (107.0× vs 25.0× for Procter & Gamble Co), so investors pay more for each dollar of its earnings. Fisclear flags 2 medium- or high-severity risks for e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. and 1 for Procter & Gamble Co.
Based on filings for periods ending 30 Jun 2026 (ELF) and 30 Sept 2026 (PG) · Updated
FisclearScore Comparison
FisclearScore is a quantitative model. ELF shown solid · PG shown dashed. Not financial advice.
| Metric | ELF | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $105.96 | $165.59 |
| Market Cap | $6.3B | $384.6B |
| P/E (TTM) | 107.0x | 25.0x |
| P/B | 5.3x | 7.2x |
| Beta | 1.60 | 0.38 |
| Div Yield | 0.00% | 2.78% |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.6B | $87.0B |
| Net Income | $26M | $16.0B |
| Gross Margin | 70.7% | — |
| Risk Flags | 2 flags | 2 flags |
Related comparisons
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR, Yahoo Finance, and official exchange filings. For informational purposes only. Not financial advice.