Financial Comparison

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. vs Kimberly-clark Corporation

Click a ticker to view the full analysis.

ELF vs

In short

Kimberly-clark Corporation is the more profitable of the two, keeping 12.3% of revenue as net profit against 1.6% for e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. trades at the higher trailing P/E (107.0× vs 19.3× for Kimberly-clark Corporation), so investors pay more for each dollar of its earnings. Fisclear flags 2 medium- or high-severity risks for e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. and 3 for Kimberly-clark Corporation.

Based on filings for periods ending 30 Jun 2026 (ELF) and 30 Jun 2026 (KMB) · Updated

FisclearScore Comparison

ELF61Fair
KMB68Strong
Quality+5
64
69
Efficiency+35
35
70
Value+13
62
75
Cashflow+2
82
80
Regime+5
50
55
Peers+21
76
55

FisclearScore is a quantitative model. ELF shown solid · KMB shown dashed. Not financial advice.

MetricELFKMB
Price$105.96$97.74
Market Cap$6.3B$32.4B
P/E (TTM)107.0x19.3x
P/B5.3x18.6x
Beta1.600.28
Div Yield0.00%5.18%
Revenue (TTM)$1.6B$16.4B
Net Income$26M$2.0B
Gross Margin70.7%36.0%
Risk Flags2 flags3 flags

Related comparisons

Data sourced from SEC EDGAR, Yahoo Finance, and official exchange filings. For informational purposes only. Not financial advice.