Financial Comparison
ConocoPhillips vs SLB Limited
Click a ticker to view the full analysis.
COP vs
In short
ConocoPhillips is the more profitable of the two, keeping 13.6% of revenue as net profit against 9.4% for SLB Limited. SLB Limited trades at the higher trailing P/E (23.7× vs 17.8× for ConocoPhillips), so investors pay more for each dollar of its earnings. Fisclear flags 0 medium- or high-severity risks for ConocoPhillips and 0 for SLB Limited.
Based on filings for periods ending 30 Jun 2026 (COP) and 30 Jun 2026 (SLB) · Updated
FisclearScore Comparison
COP66Strong
SLB58Fair
Quality+15
65
50
Efficiency+5
50
55
Value+13
75
62
Cashflow+9
88
79
Regime+5
55
50
Peers+14
64
50
FisclearScore is a quantitative model. COP shown solid · SLB shown dashed. Not financial advice.
| Metric | COP | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $134.19 | $48.98 |
| Market Cap | $161.2B | $72.7B |
| P/E (TTM) | 17.8x | 23.7x |
| P/B | 2.5x | 2.8x |
| Beta | 0.24 | 0.84 |
| Div Yield | 2.44% | 2.42% |
| Revenue (TTM) | $58.9B | $35.7B |
| Net Income | $8.0B | $3.4B |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Risk Flags | — | — |
Related comparisons
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR, Yahoo Finance, and official exchange filings. For informational purposes only. Not financial advice.